Talk:Perpetual war
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Perpetual war article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 730 days  |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Forever war page were merged into Perpetual war on 5 November 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
alledged bias
[edit]The In the media section especially seems to be highly biased. Not to say it isn't true, but presenting it as commonly accepted fact is not NPOV. Orborde 04:21, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Cyborg 009 importance?
[edit]Is cyborg 009 important enough to mention in this article? I doubt it.
Doctor Who
[edit]Do we really need three examples from Doctor Who? Can't we trim it down to the most notable example?
Categories:
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class Cold War articles
- Low-importance Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles