User talk:Rakkar/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Rakkar. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Welcome!
Additional tips:
- Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
- Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
- You might want to add yourself to the New User Log.
- If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language.
→ JarlaxleArtemis 03:57, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC) -- Did you know this guy has been banned indefinitely from all wikimedia sites? bloody n'famous
Masthead Island
Hi rakkar, no worries, thanks for doing the hard work with researching and starting the page. I merely had to review it and correct some factual inaccuracies. No probs with any of your additions except about mining on the island. The EPA National Park link at the end of the article mentions that Masthead Island is relatively undisturbed and human impacts on the island have been rare. I couldn't find any mention of guano mining on Masthead on the net, but know that such mining did occur on nearby Lady Musgrave Island and North West Island. If you have a reference supporting that guano mining occurred on Masthead, please by all means add it to the links list, otherwise I think the mining stuff should be removed from the article.
Cheers! BrightLights 09:48, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Oils Alive Again by rakka of oz.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Oils Alive Again by rakka of oz.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. --Adam Clark(User_Talk) (email) 05:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
No problem... the new tag looks good to me. --Adam Clark(User_Talk) (email) 08:19, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Adwellchurch.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Adwellchurch.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Dirt Music
A long time ago (in the wiki world) you made a comment about the novel Dirt Music being from the year 2001 and not 2002, you were of course right. Just so you know, I've update the article a bit, but it still needs work to de-stub it - if you feel like taking a shot at the Literary significance & criticism section that would be awesome. As for me, I haven't read the book yet but am a big fan of the soundtrack. --Cody.Pope 07:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Little context in JEFF MAWKES
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on JEFF MAWKES, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because JEFF MAWKES is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting JEFF MAWKES, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 03:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:SocialServicesUserboxIcon.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:SS.JPG. The copy called Image:SS.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 08:59, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Heading for article
Just a brief note of thanks for your courtesy in contacting me regarding your suggestion for the change in title for the Greens article. It is a pity that there is not more of this courtesy generally within the editing process (I note that someone else subsequently changed the heading without waiting for any further discussion). Anyways, thanks again, I appreciate your courtesy. JDAKINS (talk) 21:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC) User:JDAKINS
- Hi Rakkar, this stuff belongs (if anywhere) in the "critique" section of the Green Politics page. It certainly doesn't fit into the "influence" section here. I may be somewhat biased here, but I think the reportage of the issue gives it undue weight. I have no doubt that JDAKINS and the article's author (if they are different people) think that it's a defining issue, but you'd have to say that there hasn't been a lot of other mention of this "problem" elsewhere. And there are no balancing opinions to reference, though you did a good job in your revision of the original insertion.
- The reliability of the referenced source is also called into question by it's unsupported claim that the "insult" to US President George W Bush by Greens Senators was the main factor in the continued detention of Mamdouh Habib and David Hicks in Guantanamo Bay. Surely just a little far fetched and perhaps a sign of an obsessive position re Greens by the author. Chrismaltby (talk) 13:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:Rakkar. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |